• Welcome to Your Jockstraps

    Your Jockstraps is a full-featured website featuring discussion forums, galleries, profiles, search capabilities and a robust private message system to converse with other like-minded guys who are into jockstraps.

    While you are more than welcome to enjoy the site as a guest, the real fun begins when you register and become a member. And just in case you're wondering, Your Jockstraps is and always will be 100% free.

    The website may appear daunting but trust me, once you get used to it, it will feel like home in no-time. As a start, be sure to read my post in the News and Announcements Forum . There's lots of help available in the FAQ Pages and if you still can't figure something out, then post a question in the Questions, Help and Support Forum and I'll do my best to help you.

    When you do join, don't forget to spend some time setting up your Profile, it's your home. Upload a profile photo and be sure to fill in some of the Account Details as what you fill in will appear on your Profile Page under the About tab.

  • Raw Studio Blue Collar Leather Jocks at   Jockstrap Central
    Raw Studio Blue Collar Leather Jocks
    Don't forget to use discount code YOURJOCKSTRAPS to get 10% off any non-sale items.

Any coaches here, former or present, with a jockstrap fetish

Jockstrap Jimmy

Jockstrap Fan
I would like to know if there are any coaches / former coaches on this site. Did you subject your gym students to jock checks, and if it either led you to have a jockstrap fetish, were maybe the jock checks to feed your pre existing fetish. Or did you develop a fetish when you were a student and then you had the opportunity to conduct jock checks in gym class.
 

jocksnsocks2002

Jocksnsocks2002
Yes. I was a originally a varsity athlete, served in the military, and then held two responsibilities: pre-season training coach (what is today sometimes called "boot camp" technique for JV's to transition to Varsity status) and full-season coach. I held responsibilities for high school, undergraduate, and post-grad age groups. While I always stressed the importance of wearing both regular jockstraps and cup-jocks (I coached contact sports), I have to say that at no time did I ever inspect. Fetish/fantasy must be put aside. Parents entrusted their sons - what we all were at one time in our younger lives - to a "stranger", and I took that trust most seriously. Owing to the time period (a lifetime ago by some measure), all of the gear was distributed on a daily basis from the equipment room, and there were giant bins filled with jockstraps. I can only say that at the end of practice, the bins were quite filled with gear, including the jockstraps, so it is reasonable to assume that most, if not all, of the players were properly jocked.
Like most of the gentlemen on this great site (thank you, John!), I was introduced to a Bike # 10 cream-coloured athletic supporter when I entered the sixth grade. I have worn a jockstrap daily since, both for my own athletic training and as a coach and officer. I do not consider the jockstrap as a fetish, but rather as a proper piece of equipment appropriately categorized as a part of preventative sports' medicine. I am part of the generation which was taught and has accepted the concept that the primary function of a regular supporter is to secure the testicles while a cup-jock is to minimize/deflect injury from a direct hit.
Recently there was a national study which indicated a continued decline in fertility capability amongst men in this most recent generation since the millennium. Is there a correlation to the decline in fertility and the decline in the use of jockstraps? If, as I believe, the primary function of a jockstrap is to protect the testicles from over-heating or from suffering from a disruption in oxygen/blood (this happens when the two cords become entangled if the testicles shift in position; the jockstrap pouch is designed to keep the testicles in the same position and thus minimize the twisting of the cords which results in "blue balls"), then as each successive school-age young man eschews wearing proper testicular protection, how much unseen but long-term damage happens to his fertility? Wearing boxers or compression shorts or spandex tights - or "going commando" - whilst in serious athletic training is perhaps contributing (or should I say, diminishing) the issue of scrotal safety.
So, while I am a strong advocate that every athlete, military personnel, and all who are involved with professions in which there is stress and strain upon the genital area (for example, yard work, lifting boxes, climbing ladders to hang Christmas lights, etc.) should dutifully strap into a jock, I am perhaps one coach who has not consider my use and support (yes, every pun intended) of jockstraps as a fetish. For me, it is a professional and health-wise priority to always be jocked.
Let me close here by saying that it is my long-term hope that all of us who have benefited in our own lives from wearing a jockstrap have a professional, if not also moral responsibility to teach the next generation. I recall reading (and someone please correct me if I am mistaken) that at its apex, Bike was selling more than 3 million jockstraps each year. Today, the number of athletic supporters - and the fashion variants - account for only a fraction of that former total. Why? Has the male anatomy changed? No. But public perception, indeed squeamishness, has shifted the mindset away from the imperative of especially protecting early teenagers, who are growing and developing, from long-term injury to their virility. The "simple, humble" jockstrap has perhaps contributed more than anything, in generations past, to the ability of men to enjoy good health and yes, a healthy sex life, because early on, their developing testicles were protected.
Let me know your thoughts.
Mike
 

billTO

Jockstrap Fan
Yes. I was a originally a varsity athlete, served in the military, and then held two responsibilities: pre-season training coach (what is today sometimes called "boot camp" technique for JV's to transition to Varsity status) and full-season coach. I held responsibilities for high school, undergraduate, and post-grad age groups. While I always stressed the importance of wearing both regular jockstraps and cup-jocks (I coached contact sports), I have to say that at no time did I ever inspect. Fetish/fantasy must be put aside. Parents entrusted their sons - what we all were at one time in our younger lives - to a "stranger", and I took that trust most seriously. Owing to the time period (a lifetime ago by some measure), all of the gear was distributed on a daily basis from the equipment room, and there were giant bins filled with jockstraps. I can only say that at the end of practice, the bins were quite filled with gear, including the jockstraps, so it is reasonable to assume that most, if not all, of the players were properly jocked.
Like most of the gentlemen on this great site (thank you, John!), I was introduced to a Bike # 10 cream-coloured athletic supporter when I entered the sixth grade. I have worn a jockstrap daily since, both for my own athletic training and as a coach and officer. I do not consider the jockstrap as a fetish, but rather as a proper piece of equipment appropriately categorized as a part of preventative sports' medicine. I am part of the generation which was taught and has accepted the concept that the primary function of a regular supporter is to secure the testicles while a cup-jock is to minimize/deflect injury from a direct hit.
Recently there was a national study which indicated a continued decline in fertility capability amongst men in this most recent generation since the millennium. Is there a correlation to the decline in fertility and the decline in the use of jockstraps? If, as I believe, the primary function of a jockstrap is to protect the testicles from over-heating or from suffering from a disruption in oxygen/blood (this happens when the two cords become entangled if the testicles shift in position; the jockstrap pouch is designed to keep the testicles in the same position and thus minimize the twisting of the cords which results in "blue balls"), then as each successive school-age young man eschews wearing proper testicular protection, how much unseen but long-term damage happens to his fertility? Wearing boxers or compression shorts or spandex tights - or "going commando" - whilst in serious athletic training is perhaps contributing (or should I say, diminishing) the issue of scrotal safety.
So, while I am a strong advocate that every athlete, military personnel, and all who are involved with professions in which there is stress and strain upon the genital area (for example, yard work, lifting boxes, climbing ladders to hang Christmas lights, etc.) should dutifully strap into a jock, I am perhaps one coach who has not consider my use and support (yes, every pun intended) of jockstraps as a fetish. For me, it is a professional and health-wise priority to always be jocked.
Let me close here by saying that it is my long-term hope that all of us who have benefited in our own lives from wearing a jockstrap have a professional, if not also moral responsibility to teach the next generation. I recall reading (and someone please correct me if I am mistaken) that at its apex, Bike was selling more than 3 million jockstraps each year. Today, the number of athletic supporters - and the fashion variants - account for only a fraction of that former total. Why? Has the male anatomy changed? No. But public perception, indeed squeamishness, has shifted the mindset away from the imperative of especially protecting early teenagers, who are growing and developing, from long-term injury to their virility. The "simple, humble" jockstrap has perhaps contributed more than anything, in generations past, to the ability of men to enjoy good health and yes, a healthy sex life, because early on, their developing testicles were protected.
Let me know your thoughts.
Mike
Interesting observations.
 
D

Deleted member 1943

Guest
Mike, great post. I view a jockstrap as required equipment for certain activities. When I was a young man it was for PE and sports. If there were fast moving objects involved I wore a cup. In my adult life I wear one for running, swimming, tennis, gym, etc. For yard work, specifically mowing the lawn, I wear a cup. A rock under a mower can be like shrapnel. I don’t wear a jockstrap for general purpose underwear though.

With respect to testicular torsion, it is especially important for young men to wear a jock. The most common age where this occurs is between 12 and 18. Without prompt treatment it could lead to the loss of a testicle. When it comes to wearing a jock, the old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” could not be more true.

As with many things, there are a lot of options for scrotal support out there. This is different from when I first started wearing the same cream-colored Bike #10. At the time, it was the only real option. I apply the “if it‘s not broken, don‘t fix it” rule. For my needs, a jockstrap has always worked well, so it doesn’t need to be fixed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alex Bralmy

Jockstrap lover / Bulge worshiper
Yes. I was a originally a varsity athlete, served in the military, and then held two responsibilities: pre-season training coach (what is today sometimes called "boot camp" technique for JV's to transition to Varsity status) and full-season coach. I held responsibilities for high school, undergraduate, and post-grad age groups. While I always stressed the importance of wearing both regular jockstraps and cup-jocks (I coached contact sports), I have to say that at no time did I ever inspect. Fetish/fantasy must be put aside. Parents entrusted their sons - what we all were at one time in our younger lives - to a "stranger", and I took that trust most seriously. Owing to the time period (a lifetime ago by some measure), all of the gear was distributed on a daily basis from the equipment room, and there were giant bins filled with jockstraps. I can only say that at the end of practice, the bins were quite filled with gear, including the jockstraps, so it is reasonable to assume that most, if not all, of the players were properly jocked.
Like most of the gentlemen on this great site (thank you, John!), I was introduced to a Bike # 10 cream-coloured athletic supporter when I entered the sixth grade. I have worn a jockstrap daily since, both for my own athletic training and as a coach and officer. I do not consider the jockstrap as a fetish, but rather as a proper piece of equipment appropriately categorized as a part of preventative sports' medicine. I am part of the generation which was taught and has accepted the concept that the primary function of a regular supporter is to secure the testicles while a cup-jock is to minimize/deflect injury from a direct hit.
Recently there was a national study which indicated a continued decline in fertility capability amongst men in this most recent generation since the millennium. Is there a correlation to the decline in fertility and the decline in the use of jockstraps? If, as I believe, the primary function of a jockstrap is to protect the testicles from over-heating or from suffering from a disruption in oxygen/blood (this happens when the two cords become entangled if the testicles shift in position; the jockstrap pouch is designed to keep the testicles in the same position and thus minimize the twisting of the cords which results in "blue balls"), then as each successive school-age young man eschews wearing proper testicular protection, how much unseen but long-term damage happens to his fertility? Wearing boxers or compression shorts or spandex tights - or "going commando" - whilst in serious athletic training is perhaps contributing (or should I say, diminishing) the issue of scrotal safety.
So, while I am a strong advocate that every athlete, military personnel, and all who are involved with professions in which there is stress and strain upon the genital area (for example, yard work, lifting boxes, climbing ladders to hang Christmas lights, etc.) should dutifully strap into a jock, I am perhaps one coach who has not consider my use and support (yes, every pun intended) of jockstraps as a fetish. For me, it is a professional and health-wise priority to always be jocked.
Let me close here by saying that it is my long-term hope that all of us who have benefited in our own lives from wearing a jockstrap have a professional, if not also moral responsibility to teach the next generation. I recall reading (and someone please correct me if I am mistaken) that at its apex, Bike was selling more than 3 million jockstraps each year. Today, the number of athletic supporters - and the fashion variants - account for only a fraction of that former total. Why? Has the male anatomy changed? No. But public perception, indeed squeamishness, has shifted the mindset away from the imperative of especially protecting early teenagers, who are growing and developing, from long-term injury to their virility. The "simple, humble" jockstrap has perhaps contributed more than anything, in generations past, to the ability of men to enjoy good health and yes, a healthy sex life, because early on, their developing testicles were protected.
Let me know your thoughts
Yes. I was a originally a varsity athlete, served in the military, and then held two responsibilities: pre-season training coach (what is today sometimes called "boot camp" technique for JV's to transition to Varsity status) and full-season coach. I held responsibilities for high school, undergraduate, and post-grad age groups. While I always stressed the importance of wearing both regular jockstraps and cup-jocks (I coached contact sports), I have to say that at no time did I ever inspect. Fetish/fantasy must be put aside. Parents entrusted their sons - what we all were at one time in our younger lives - to a "stranger", and I took that trust most seriously. Owing to the time period (a lifetime ago by some measure), all of the gear was distributed on a daily basis from the equipment room, and there were giant bins filled with jockstraps. I can only say that at the end of practice, the bins were quite filled with gear, including the jockstraps, so it is reasonable to assume that most, if not all, of the players were properly jocked.
Like most of the gentlemen on this great site (thank you, John!), I was introduced to a Bike # 10 cream-coloured athletic supporter when I entered the sixth grade. I have worn a jockstrap daily since, both for my own athletic training and as a coach and officer. I do not consider the jockstrap as a fetish, but rather as a proper piece of equipment appropriately categorized as a part of preventative sports' medicine. I am part of the generation which was taught and has accepted the concept that the primary function of a regular supporter is to secure the testicles while a cup-jock is to minimize/deflect injury from a direct hit.
Recently there was a national study which indicated a continued decline in fertility capability amongst men in this most recent generation since the millennium. Is there a correlation to the decline in fertility and the decline in the use of jockstraps? If, as I believe, the primary function of a jockstrap is to protect the testicles from over-heating or from suffering from a disruption in oxygen/blood (this happens when the two cords become entangled if the testicles shift in position; the jockstrap pouch is designed to keep the testicles in the same position and thus minimize the twisting of the cords which results in "blue balls"), then as each successive school-age young man eschews wearing proper testicular protection, how much unseen but long-term damage happens to his fertility? Wearing boxers or compression shorts or spandex tights - or "going commando" - whilst in serious athletic training is perhaps contributing (or should I say, diminishing) the issue of scrotal safety.
So, while I am a strong advocate that every athlete, military personnel, and all who are involved with professions in which there is stress and strain upon the genital area (for example, yard work, lifting boxes, climbing ladders to hang Christmas lights, etc.) should dutifully strap into a jock, I am perhaps one coach who has not consider my use and support (yes, every pun intended) of jockstraps as a fetish. For me, it is a professional and health-wise priority to always be jocked.
Let me close here by saying that it is my long-term hope that all of us who have benefited in our own lives from wearing a jockstrap have a professional, if not also moral responsibility to teach the next generation. I recall reading (and someone please correct me if I am mistaken) that at its apex, Bike was selling more than 3 million jockstraps each year. Today, the number of athletic supporters - and the fashion variants - account for only a fraction of that former total. Why? Has the male anatomy changed? No. But public perception, indeed squeamishness, has shifted the mindset away from the imperative of especially protecting early teenagers, who are growing and developing, from long-term injury to their virility. The "simple, humble" jockstrap has perhaps contributed more than anything, in generations past, to the ability of men to enjoy good health and yes, a healthy sex life, because early on, their developing testicles were protected.
Let me know your thoughts.
Mike
Much respect!
 

jocksnsocks2002

Jocksnsocks2002
Mike, great post. I view a jockstrap as required equipment for certain activities. When I was a young man it was for PE and sports. If there were fast moving objects involved I wore a cup. In my adult life I wear one for running, swimming, tennis, gym, etc. For yard work, specifically mowing the lawn, I wear a cup. A rock under a mower can be like shrapnel. I don’t wear a jockstrap for general purpose underwear though.

With respect to testicular torsion, it is especially important for young men to wear a jock. The most common age where this occurs is between 12 and 18. Without prompt treatment it could lead to the loss of a testicle. When it comes to wearing a jock, the old adage “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” could not be more true.

As with many things, there are a lot of options for scrotal support out there. This is different from when I first started wearing the same cream-colored Bike #10. At the time, it was the only real option. I apply the “if it‘s not broken, don‘t fix it” rule. For my needs, a jockstrap has always worked well, so it doesn’t need to be fixed.
Dear "JockAndRoll",
What a very kind letter - thank you. We are undoubtedly of the same vintage and therefore upbringing. I am the child of medical professionals so healthcare was emphasized in our home, and as I entered puberty, in addition to "the talk", my Dad discussed the imperative of wearing an athletic supporter. You have cited all of the reasons most articulately, and to paraphrase, the "jockstrap holds these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator" (it makes you wonder what the Founding Fathers also knew!). I only wish that schools today would explain the sports-medicine reasons for being jocked. While compression shorts and "Peter Pan tights" have a specific function, they are not designed to protect the genitals in the midst of stress and strain. I think that too many young people today regard jockstraps as a quirky fetish, whereas multiple previous generations of boys-men were raised to respect genital care and protection. Let me add that like you, I also wore a cup when mowing the lawn (the traditional Bike with the two-snap pocket).
Thank you for your kind comments. I wish you the best of health and safety as we commence the New Year.
Mike
 

jocksnsocks2002

Jocksnsocks2002
Much respect!
Dear Alex,
Thank you for your kind comment. Yes, I have the highest respect for jockstraps because I was taught and consider them to be part of preventative sports medicine. I am not a scientist by training, but I am convinced that there is a correlation between the dramatic decline in jockstrap usage and the dramatic increase in genital issues (low fertility, erectile dysfunction, etc.). How many young men have been injured, perhaps for the rest of their adult lives, without knowing it? They either did not know or chose not to follow the advice to properly strap into a secure jock. In the midst of some activity, one testicle crisscrossed the cord with the other, and the consequences could be devastating much later.
In all events, thank you for your note. I wish you the best of health and safety as we commence the New Year.
Mike
 
Top